<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Chip of Doom</title>
	<atom:link href="http://twopointouch.com/2007/stuff/the-chip-of-doom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://twopointouch.com/2007/stuff/the-chip-of-doom/</link>
	<description>web 2.0, blogs and social media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 00:12:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: alan p</title>
		<link>http://twopointouch.com/2007/stuff/the-chip-of-doom/#comment-11311</link>
		<dc:creator>alan p</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 23:13:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twopointouch.com/2007/08/02/the-chip-of-doom/#comment-11311</guid>
		<description>RFID comes from the shop floor / logistics tagging game so not suprised re WiP stats.

I have a piece of research in my hands predicting that if RFID gets to $0.01 we will be putting them in everything - pieces of clothing, car keys etc. The Use cases given are of course all very heavenly (find those keys) but a moments thought comes to some serious abUse cases, never mind a total, irrevocable loss of privacy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RFID comes from the shop floor / logistics tagging game so not suprised re WiP stats.</p>
<p>I have a piece of research in my hands predicting that if RFID gets to $0.01 we will be putting them in everything &#8211; pieces of clothing, car keys etc. The Use cases given are of course all very heavenly (find those keys) but a moments thought comes to some serious abUse cases, never mind a total, irrevocable loss of privacy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Delaney</title>
		<link>http://twopointouch.com/2007/stuff/the-chip-of-doom/#comment-11293</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Delaney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 22:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twopointouch.com/2007/08/02/the-chip-of-doom/#comment-11293</guid>
		<description>Ah - but you&#039;d never hear that story because they&#039;re doomed. Doooomed, I say.

@Carlos - time for that coffee?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah &#8211; but you&#8217;d never hear that story because they&#8217;re doomed. Doooomed, I say.</p>
<p>@Carlos &#8211; time for that coffee?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Cruickshank</title>
		<link>http://twopointouch.com/2007/stuff/the-chip-of-doom/#comment-11290</link>
		<dc:creator>David Cruickshank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 15:14:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twopointouch.com/2007/08/02/the-chip-of-doom/#comment-11290</guid>
		<description>I reckon BA should start using RFID to keep better track of people&#039;s luggage and to actually confirm whether a bag and its owner are on the same plane.  What have they got to lose, they can&#039;t get much worse!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I reckon BA should start using RFID to keep better track of people&#8217;s luggage and to actually confirm whether a bag and its owner are on the same plane.  What have they got to lose, they can&#8217;t get much worse!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlo</title>
		<link>http://twopointouch.com/2007/stuff/the-chip-of-doom/#comment-11289</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 15:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twopointouch.com/2007/08/02/the-chip-of-doom/#comment-11289</guid>
		<description>Why all this resembles me a strip of Dilbert?
Maybe because it&#039;s easier to take it ironically than seriously?

Welcome Back</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why all this resembles me a strip of Dilbert?<br />
Maybe because it&#8217;s easier to take it ironically than seriously?</p>
<p>Welcome Back</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
