Comments on: We, the Audience http://twopointouch.com/2007/social-media/we-the-audience/ web 2.0, blogs and social media Mon, 15 Mar 2010 00:32:57 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Ugly Betty is lost! but Web 2.0 version 3.7 is available as a PDF download - The Yourdon Report - Blogging the impact of computer-related technology trends, and whatever else catches my interest. http://twopointouch.com/2007/social-media/we-the-audience/comment-page-1/#comment-11587 Ugly Betty is lost! but Web 2.0 version 3.7 is available as a PDF download - The Yourdon Report - Blogging the impact of computer-related technology trends, and whatever else catches my interest. Wed, 03 Oct 2007 01:48:54 +0000 http://twopointouch.com/2007/09/25/we-the-audience/#comment-11587 [...] page 38: I added a bullet point that contains a link to an article about on aspect of the “1% rule” — i.e., that 2% of Wiki users generate 60% of it [...] [...] page 38: I added a bullet point that contains a link to an article about on aspect of the “1% rule” — i.e., that 2% of Wiki users generate 60% of it [...]

]]> By: Ian Delaney http://twopointouch.com/2007/social-media/we-the-audience/comment-page-1/#comment-11582 Ian Delaney Tue, 02 Oct 2007 21:04:13 +0000 http://twopointouch.com/2007/09/25/we-the-audience/#comment-11582 I'll get back to thoof asap and check it again. Thanks for your contribution, Scott. I’ll get back to thoof asap and check it again.

Thanks for your contribution, Scott.

]]> By: Scott Miller http://twopointouch.com/2007/social-media/we-the-audience/comment-page-1/#comment-11581 Scott Miller Tue, 02 Oct 2007 20:47:04 +0000 http://twopointouch.com/2007/09/25/we-the-audience/#comment-11581 Thats only true if you're measuring the number of people as a whole. If you measure out of everyone who sees a story, how many found it interesting, and use that as a ratio, you're measuring interest, not popularity. Its *popularity* that causes a "topic du jour" effect. Thats only true if you’re measuring the number of people as a whole. If you measure out of everyone who sees a story, how many found it interesting, and use that as a ratio, you’re measuring interest, not popularity. Its *popularity* that causes a “topic du jour” effect.

]]> By: Ian Delaney http://twopointouch.com/2007/social-media/we-the-audience/comment-page-1/#comment-11579 Ian Delaney Tue, 02 Oct 2007 19:49:13 +0000 http://twopointouch.com/2007/09/25/we-the-audience/#comment-11579 "People as a whole" feels equivalent to the (utterly lame IMHO) techmeme effect where dozens of bloggers add their own (worthless) comment to the topic du jour. I don't want the topic du jour - I want the really interesting "fact-et" that no-one else has latched onto. BTW, full respect for what you're doing. Finding that random factet takes me hours and you guys can make it automated for most. But I don't trust you to find the thing I'm looking for. Sorry :) “People as a whole” feels equivalent to the (utterly lame IMHO) techmeme effect where dozens of bloggers add their own (worthless) comment to the topic du jour. I don’t want the topic du jour – I want the really interesting “fact-et” that no-one else has latched onto.

BTW, full respect for what you’re doing. Finding that random factet takes me hours and you guys can make it automated for most. But I don’t trust you to find the thing I’m looking for. Sorry :)

]]> By: Scott Miller http://twopointouch.com/2007/social-media/we-the-audience/comment-page-1/#comment-11578 Scott Miller Tue, 02 Oct 2007 19:31:27 +0000 http://twopointouch.com/2007/09/25/we-the-audience/#comment-11578 Not at all, we merely measure the interest in all articles, and show you things that are "highly interesting" to people as a whole, regardless of your particular topic interests. Note that the way we measure interesting is also independent of the number of readers, so you don't get a "Digg effect" of the masses boosting a story. Not at all, we merely measure the interest in all articles, and show you things that are “highly interesting” to people as a whole, regardless of your particular topic interests. Note that the way we measure interesting is also independent of the number of readers, so you don’t get a “Digg effect” of the masses boosting a story.

]]> By: Ian Delaney http://twopointouch.com/2007/social-media/we-the-audience/comment-page-1/#comment-11575 Ian Delaney Tue, 02 Oct 2007 18:47:33 +0000 http://twopointouch.com/2007/09/25/we-the-audience/#comment-11575 Thanks for the comment, Scott. But surely, that would involve some sort of editorial judgement if you're to find interesting things that I haven't shown an interest in? In which case, how do you know what that is? Thanks for the comment, Scott. But surely, that would involve some sort of editorial judgement if you’re to find interesting things that I haven’t shown an interest in? In which case, how do you know what that is?

]]> By: Scott Miller http://twopointouch.com/2007/social-media/we-the-audience/comment-page-1/#comment-11568 Scott Miller Mon, 01 Oct 2007 14:45:00 +0000 http://twopointouch.com/2007/09/25/we-the-audience/#comment-11568 You mention sites like Thoof not gaining your trust because they only show you what you read. We're well aware of that, which is why what Thoof shows you is a mix of what you've shown you like, and what is interesting even if you haven't seen things like it yet. It doesn't have to be either/or. You mention sites like Thoof not gaining your trust because they only show you what you read. We’re well aware of that, which is why what Thoof shows you is a mix of what you’ve shown you like, and what is interesting even if you haven’t seen things like it yet.

It doesn’t have to be either/or.

]]> By: BUZZBIZWEB » Blog Archive http://twopointouch.com/2007/social-media/we-the-audience/comment-page-1/#comment-11564 BUZZBIZWEB » Blog Archive Sat, 29 Sep 2007 22:38:11 +0000 http://twopointouch.com/2007/09/25/we-the-audience/#comment-11564 [...] excellent article lu sur le blog Two Point Touch rétabli la vérité sur la contribution des internautes sur les sites dits « sociaux » [...] [...] excellent article lu sur le blog Two Point Touch rétabli la vérité sur la contribution des internautes sur les sites dits « sociaux » [...]

]]> By: Born On The Web » Blog Archive » links for 2007-09-27 http://twopointouch.com/2007/social-media/we-the-audience/comment-page-1/#comment-11552 Born On The Web » Blog Archive » links for 2007-09-27 Thu, 27 Sep 2007 00:35:00 +0000 http://twopointouch.com/2007/09/25/we-the-audience/#comment-11552 [...] twopointouch : We, the Audience nuance on 1% rule (tags: community social socialmedia) [...] [...] twopointouch : We, the Audience nuance on 1% rule (tags: community social socialmedia) [...]

]]> By: Loving Links « The Rosemont Loving http://twopointouch.com/2007/social-media/we-the-audience/comment-page-1/#comment-11549 Loving Links « The Rosemont Loving Wed, 26 Sep 2007 09:10:18 +0000 http://twopointouch.com/2007/09/25/we-the-audience/#comment-11549 [...] 2004 Loving Links Wednesday September 26th 2007, 10:09 am Filed under: Links 1. Twopointouch - We, the [...] [...] 2004 Loving Links Wednesday September 26th 2007, 10:09 am Filed under: Links 1. Twopointouch – We, the [...]

]]>