Ban Me Now and the Farters Will Be Next

Feeling angry about the smoking ban. Sorry for off-topic.

I have two weeks left before the UK smoking ban kicks in; two weeks to cause havoc and mayhem. Because we smokers are the true face of anarchy in the UK, eh?

No-one ever voiced any objections to public smoking before about 1995. These terribly frail people who start coughing every time you spark up within a 100 feet didn’t exist. No one moaned about the smell. Why is that? What’s happened? It’s not because our society was much more liberal, I think. It seemed like most people were more conservative about a lot of social matters like sex and drugs and public behaviour back then. And not because a significantly larger number of people smoked. The percentage of the population remains about the same, though the number of smoking ABC1s is much reduced. Neither was it because there were fewer facts known about smoking or passive smoking. It’s because there were (and are) far more important fish to fry.

What seems to have changed and have allowed this to happen is the increasing climate of fear. Most British people, the opinion-survey people MORI tell us, are terrified. They are frightened of almost everything: from their food to their children. The biggest fear that the majority have is terrifying prospect of… ermm.. teenagers ‘hanging around’. The ‘hoodie menace’ is everywhere, it seems. We think we’re going to get mugged, robbed, bombed, poisoned and raped. We’re frightened of our young; we’re frightened of anyone different; we’re frightened of our food. Apparently, since the terrorist attacks of 11/9/2001, there’s been a real step-change. British society has become considerably more frightened. And the further away those terrible events are, the more frightened we become. Again, according to MORI polls.

This climate of fear is illusionary, of course. Statistically, we’re actually less likely to come to any kind of harm than ever before. We really have never had it so good. We earn more, are healthier and crime levels are lower than at any time in the last forty years.

So while the dangers of smoking existed before, and were well publicised, no one gave a shit until recent times. Until we decided that danger was round every corner. And oh - how easy it is to exact complete vengeance on one of these stupid hang-ups about something so much less important than climate change, global and local poverty or public services. It took the C21st climate of fear to turn the facts about one drug, among many that are allowed to us, into a public policy that curtails all of our freedoms, smoker or not. Rather than exorcise the smokers, I’d suggest that there are other, larger demons to be exorcised.

/rant


6 Comments

Ian Fenn

I guess I’m one of those terribly frail people you mentioned. When someone smokes near me, my nose starts producing mucous. This blocks my nose and runs down the back of my throat. Headaches follow later. Not exactly what you want when you’re simply looking to enjoy dinner or a pint. So, the 1st of July means freedom for me.

No, I’ll go with you on that, Ian D.

On a personal level, I think I’ll enjoy the ban. But that’s not good enough.

There has to be another way to satisfy more people. Maybe it’s middle age, but I just get irritated by the nannying, one-size-fits-all, you-lot-don’t-know-what’s-good-for-you nature of this legislation…

I promise not to start buying the Daily Mail however.

Ian, if you need to give up, why not try my dad’s method? Smoking-related heart disease, then four weeks unconscious in intensive care.

He’s still with us, though in serious pain because smoking reduced his circulation to the point where no blood goes to his legs. Shame really, his grandchildren idolise him.

I think we all know smoking’s bad for you, and that a lot of people don’t like it. Also, I’m all for non-smoking areas in every venue and consideration for others.

@Ian F: as I say, all in favour of considerateness, and improved facilities would allow us all to be considerate, not just the moral majority.

@adrian: research (which I can’t cite because I don’t know where it is) has already said that the policy will have no effect on the numbers starting smoking, surely the most important area to focus on…

What I really can’t stomach any more is this idea that this such a powerful social evil, that it really matters more than all the other things on our agenda. And I hate our nanny-state mentality.

And if you can’t have a little rant about this sort of thing on your own blog, where can you have it? ;-)

Ian Fenn

I’m not sure what you mean by improved facilities. Many restaurants, for example, are restricted in size, unable to implement a no-smoking area, let alone introduce air conditioning. And these restaurants would never have gone ‘no smoking’ without legislation as they would have been worried about the impact on trade. But if it’s the law, everyone is in the same boat. One of the interesting things about this ban is discussing it with one of my colleagues who is based in Glasgow, where they’ve had a ban for some time. He reckons life has generally improved as a result - and he’s a smoker. So, maybe it isn’t going to be as bad as you think. And the beauty of you ranting on your blog is that I can respond. :-)

Ian,

A new puritanism under the guise of liberalism and choice

Rob


Leave a Comment