<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Tim O&#8217;Reilly interview</title>
	<atom:link href="http://twopointouch.com/2006/web-2-0/the-tim-oreilly-interview/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://twopointouch.com/2006/web-2-0/the-tim-oreilly-interview/</link>
	<description>web 2.0, blogs and social media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 00:12:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: More Lists; Less Thinking at twopointouch: web 2.0, blogs and social media</title>
		<link>http://twopointouch.com/2006/web-2-0/the-tim-oreilly-interview/#comment-481</link>
		<dc:creator>More Lists; Less Thinking at twopointouch: web 2.0, blogs and social media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 12:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twopointouch.com/2006/08/07/the-tim-oreilly-interview/#comment-481</guid>
		<description>[...] Tim O&#8217;Reilly says &#8220;Web 2.0 is not about these bubble companies, itâ€™s about the new approaches we are trying.&#8221; Try has he might to focus on leveraging and intersecting databases, the world prefers lists of sites with funny names. Perhaps we ought to call this the digg world to avoid confusion. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tim O&#8217;Reilly says &#8220;Web 2.0 is not about these bubble companies, itâ€™s about the new approaches we are trying.&#8221; Try has he might to focus on leveraging and intersecting databases, the world prefers lists of sites with funny names. Perhaps we ought to call this the digg world to avoid confusion. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2.0 is Dead. Long Live 2.0 at twopointouch: web 2.0, blogs and social media</title>
		<link>http://twopointouch.com/2006/web-2-0/the-tim-oreilly-interview/#comment-370</link>
		<dc:creator>2.0 is Dead. Long Live 2.0 at twopointouch: web 2.0, blogs and social media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2006 14:59:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twopointouch.com/2006/08/07/the-tim-oreilly-interview/#comment-370</guid>
		<description>[...] The expression &#8216;Web 2.0&#8242; was unfortunate. It makes a promise that it&#8217;s unlikely to deliver on - a web that&#8217;s twice as good, or fixed. If the other Tim, O&#8217;Reilly, had stuck to the expression &#8216;Infoware&#8217;, people wouldn&#8217;t get nearly so upset about the subject. He told me: &#8220;I started talking about â€˜infowareâ€™, which is much the same thing [as Web 2.0], at the same conference [Linux Kongress, May 1997] that Eric Raymond started talking about The Cathedral and the Bazaar.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The expression &#8216;Web 2.0&#8242; was unfortunate. It makes a promise that it&#8217;s unlikely to deliver on &#8211; a web that&#8217;s twice as good, or fixed. If the other Tim, O&#8217;Reilly, had stuck to the expression &#8216;Infoware&#8217;, people wouldn&#8217;t get nearly so upset about the subject. He told me: &#8220;I started talking about â€˜infowareâ€™, which is much the same thing [as Web 2.0], at the same conference [Linux Kongress, May 1997] that Eric Raymond started talking about The Cathedral and the Bazaar.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The most interesting woman in the world at twopointouch: web 2.0, blogs and social media</title>
		<link>http://twopointouch.com/2006/web-2-0/the-tim-oreilly-interview/#comment-215</link>
		<dc:creator>The most interesting woman in the world at twopointouch: web 2.0, blogs and social media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 23:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twopointouch.com/2006/08/07/the-tim-oreilly-interview/#comment-215</guid>
		<description>[...] I raise this because my new pal, Tim O&#8217;Reilly, has recently written on the subject: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I raise this because my new pal, Tim O&#8217;Reilly, has recently written on the subject: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Delaney</title>
		<link>http://twopointouch.com/2006/web-2-0/the-tim-oreilly-interview/#comment-184</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Delaney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 14:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twopointouch.com/2006/08/07/the-tim-oreilly-interview/#comment-184</guid>
		<description>Who knows? I do think that people will stop talking about these things as they become the norm, though. Which seems to be happening pretty quickly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who knows? I do think that people will stop talking about these things as they become the norm, though. Which seems to be happening pretty quickly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Cruickshank</title>
		<link>http://twopointouch.com/2006/web-2-0/the-tim-oreilly-interview/#comment-178</link>
		<dc:creator>David Cruickshank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2006 10:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twopointouch.com/2006/08/07/the-tim-oreilly-interview/#comment-178</guid>
		<description>Great scoop Ian.

&quot;I originally thought is was good for a couple of years. Now, I think itâ€™s probably got another four to five years in it.&quot;  Heavens above - in four years we are going to be soooo bored of that phrase...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great scoop Ian.</p>
<p>&#8220;I originally thought is was good for a couple of years. Now, I think itâ€™s probably got another four to five years in it.&#8221;  Heavens above &#8211; in four years we are going to be soooo bored of that phrase&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
