The business of friendship

July 12th, 20069:55 am @ Ian Delaney

7


Social networking is big business, as we all know. MySpace has now become America’s most visited website with 4.46% of all web traffic in the week ending July 8th, putting it ahead of Google Search, MSN and Yahoo!. Bebo has reputedly turned down an offer of $552mn for its network, (not true – see post above) and is allegedly holding out for $1bn. What is less clear, is how these sites will evolve over the next few months, as an interview I had yesterday with ecademy founder Penny Power revealed.

Ecademy is all but unique in the social networking space in that they charge a subscription fee for their service. There are two major reasons they can get away with this. First, their network is geared towards business people. The typical member is male, in their 40s and self-employed. There aren’t too many networks targeted towards these people. There is LinkedIn, but as Penny points out, members regard this as a tool for finding people rather than a community. The second reason is that having a subscription model creates a different kind of community.

The majority of social networks are free. This means that their revenue model is based on advertising. The way to make money is to drive more traffic to their network. Ecademy has much fewer members than the big names – 80,000, with around 10% paying a subscription fee. It carries some advertising, but this isn’t really the main focus of their business plan.

Ecademy gets the money up-front – a year’s subscription costs £25. But if they are to keep this money, it means that they have to deliver customer service. The people who join the network have to feel that they are getting their money’s worth or they will ask for it back and never return. The main way to deliver this value is by giving members the connections they need. Since they are self-employed, it’s likely that they will need the help of other people – lawyers, accountants, designers, writers, PR people and so forth. Making relationships with these people through the network breeds a trust that isn’t nearly so quick to form with someone you picked from the yellow pages. Since many are home workers, the social contact with peers also has considerable value for members. Secondly, members are encouraged to donate articles to the community, giving advice and retelling experiences from their own area of expertise. Events are also a large feature of ecademy, with over 800 offline events a year where members can network with others.

Having taken £25, another responsibility is for ecademy to deliver a safe, professional atmosphere. In many respects, this is likely to be easier than it is for the larger teen sites. With fewer members, most of whom are ‘old enough to know better’, serious incidents are relatively rare, and only around 20 people have had to be banned from the site. Most of these treated the community badly, spamming members with business and investment opportunities. Nonetheless, it is moderation, of one kind or another, that eats up Penny’s time and the site has recruited volunteer mentors to ensure submitted content is professional and non-abusive (the term “moderators” was thought too harsh-sounding by the community). She points to the fact that site, and its appointed mentors, would be liable for slander actions were this allowed to get through unchecked.

Which brings me back to the larger sites. Firstly, what will keep members loyal to a particular network? Paying a subscription encourages users to search for and create the value of their investment. This doesn’t apply to a free site. If their owners focus on numbers rather than service, what will stop their members migrating to another network with a fresh gimmick. At the moment, the top sites have all the social capital – everyone’s on there because everyone’s on there. But the youth market is pretty fickle – ‘everyone’ used to be into Friendster, or taking things further, Girls Aloud. TechNewsWorld reported last month that MySpace’s appeal maybe waning among the cool kids – an overly pessimistic judgement, as last week’s figures show, but the threat is there.

The second issue is moderation. When social networks become billion-dollar businesses, and they already are, their owners will be forced to ensure that they are creating a safe environment for their users, whether these be children or adults. This is not just a question of professional responsibility, but of legal liability. MySpace is already in some trouble over the alleged grooming of children by paedophiles. I would suggest that the current cases will not be the last. But how can they moderate 90mn users? And how can they moderate their communities without destroying the anarchic, creative vibe that made it cool? They already have no choice about whetherto moderate; it is how they do this which will decide their future.

Help spread this post:

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

Possibly related posts: