<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Do 1/3 Prefer Citizen Media?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://twopointouch.com/2006/12/20/do-13-prefer-citizen-media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://twopointouch.com/2006/12/20/do-13-prefer-citizen-media/</link>
	<description>web 2.0, blogs and social media</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 02:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ian Delaney</title>
		<link>http://twopointouch.com/2006/12/20/do-13-prefer-citizen-media/#comment-7221</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Delaney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2006 23:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twopointouch.com/2006/12/20/do-13-prefer-citizen-media/#comment-7221</guid>
		<description>Webomatica - you're right, the two are very different. But more and more newspapers are deciding to outsource newsgathering to AP and Reuters for almost anything, it seems.

Obviously, only AP and Reuters can win that game given that their news feeds are free.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Webomatica - you&#8217;re right, the two are very different. But more and more newspapers are deciding to outsource newsgathering to AP and Reuters for almost anything, it seems.</p>
<p>Obviously, only AP and Reuters can win that game given that their news feeds are free.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Webomatica</title>
		<link>http://twopointouch.com/2006/12/20/do-13-prefer-citizen-media/#comment-6404</link>
		<dc:creator>Webomatica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 18:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twopointouch.com/2006/12/20/do-13-prefer-citizen-media/#comment-6404</guid>
		<description>Personally I prefer "news" from established media (CNN, NYTimes, etc.) but I'll take "opinion" on a social media website (blog, podcast, digg) any day. In my mind these two items are completely separate.

If a newspaper would just figure out what it wants to focus on (solid reporting and gathering news) - and put it all on the web they would be fine. The real thing that is dying is the "paper" - the inconvenience of the distribution method. The news is still in demand. Just give it to me in a format I want it in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally I prefer &#8220;news&#8221; from established media (CNN, NYTimes, etc.) but I&#8217;ll take &#8220;opinion&#8221; on a social media website (blog, podcast, digg) any day. In my mind these two items are completely separate.</p>
<p>If a newspaper would just figure out what it wants to focus on (solid reporting and gathering news) - and put it all on the web they would be fine. The real thing that is dying is the &#8220;paper&#8221; - the inconvenience of the distribution method. The news is still in demand. Just give it to me in a format I want it in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Boydston</title>
		<link>http://twopointouch.com/2006/12/20/do-13-prefer-citizen-media/#comment-6360</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Boydston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 01:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twopointouch.com/2006/12/20/do-13-prefer-citizen-media/#comment-6360</guid>
		<description>The paper itself is in hard times.  Really the star of northern cal, it may be one of the first to go under as a daily paper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The paper itself is in hard times.  Really the star of northern cal, it may be one of the first to go under as a daily paper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
