<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social Media Releases</title>
	<atom:link href="http://twopointouch.com/2006/12/08/social-media-releases/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://twopointouch.com/2006/12/08/social-media-releases/</link>
	<description>web 2.0, blogs and social media</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 02:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ian Delaney</title>
		<link>http://twopointouch.com/2006/12/08/social-media-releases/#comment-5570</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Delaney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Dec 2006 00:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twopointouch.com/2006/12/08/social-media-releases/#comment-5570</guid>
		<description>David, my anxiety is that encouraging clients to submit releases to digg will have a negative effect. The digg people are already very anxious about it being used as a way to spam their community and I really believe that commercial sources will be outlawed sooner or later.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David, my anxiety is that encouraging clients to submit releases to digg will have a negative effect. The digg people are already very anxious about it being used as a way to spam their community and I really believe that commercial sources will be outlawed sooner or later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david weiner</title>
		<link>http://twopointouch.com/2006/12/08/social-media-releases/#comment-5202</link>
		<dc:creator>david weiner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 21:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twopointouch.com/2006/12/08/social-media-releases/#comment-5202</guid>
		<description>I know Digg isn't a bookmarking site as Delicious is ... however, I tend to, and prefer, digging stories to bookmark them rather than use delicious. I like the dynamic digg has but am increasingly upset by the speed of the site lately. I find it much more interesting seeing the amount of diggs a story gets (especially one I submit). I think the profile page and history is much more navigable and better looking than delicious. Thanks for responding! Look forward to more ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know Digg isn&#8217;t a bookmarking site as Delicious is &#8230; however, I tend to, and prefer, digging stories to bookmark them rather than use delicious. I like the dynamic digg has but am increasingly upset by the speed of the site lately. I find it much more interesting seeing the amount of diggs a story gets (especially one I submit). I think the profile page and history is much more navigable and better looking than delicious. Thanks for responding! Look forward to more &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Delaney</title>
		<link>http://twopointouch.com/2006/12/08/social-media-releases/#comment-5191</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Delaney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 16:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twopointouch.com/2006/12/08/social-media-releases/#comment-5191</guid>
		<description>David - digg is *not* a bookmarking service, it's a news recommendation system. The digg community will act against clients that submit press releases, potentially banning them.

PRNewswire and Web have the potential to be a repository for these releases, and would certainly be better than the 100 different feeds issue I highlighted. Except I really think that it should be a free service for anyone registered as a company.

James - I was especially fond of the steak pie analogy ;) I am concerned that these sorts of DIY marketing approaches move to undermine PR companies, 90% of which do a fine job at helping me find material that's useful to readers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David - digg is *not* a bookmarking service, it&#8217;s a news recommendation system. The digg community will act against clients that submit press releases, potentially banning them.</p>
<p>PRNewswire and Web have the potential to be a repository for these releases, and would certainly be better than the 100 different feeds issue I highlighted. Except I really think that it should be a free service for anyone registered as a company.</p>
<p>James - I was especially fond of the steak pie analogy <img src='http://twopointouch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> I am concerned that these sorts of DIY marketing approaches move to undermine PR companies, 90% of which do a fine job at helping me find material that&#8217;s useful to readers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david weiner</title>
		<link>http://twopointouch.com/2006/12/08/social-media-releases/#comment-5188</link>
		<dc:creator>david weiner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 16:28:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twopointouch.com/2006/12/08/social-media-releases/#comment-5188</guid>
		<description>I agree with a lot of you assessment. Regarding your idea for a prdel.icio.us; there are already plenty: PRNewswire, PRWeb, etc.

Though Digg has the propensity to be abused, as it already has been, Digging a story doesn't mean you are digging it as a finished product. I see digg and delicious acting in many different ways for many different people. They can both bookmark and they can both increase visibility and shelf-life of a story.

I tell my clients to include links to digg and delicious when pitching journalists/bloggers because, if they can't, or don't want to, write about the story but still think it's interesting or may write about it later, digging or bookmarking the release will allow them to keep track of it, see how many people find it interesting, or at least do a small part to make the story penetrate the overflow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with a lot of you assessment. Regarding your idea for a prdel.icio.us; there are already plenty: PRNewswire, PRWeb, etc.</p>
<p>Though Digg has the propensity to be abused, as it already has been, Digging a story doesn&#8217;t mean you are digging it as a finished product. I see digg and delicious acting in many different ways for many different people. They can both bookmark and they can both increase visibility and shelf-life of a story.</p>
<p>I tell my clients to include links to digg and delicious when pitching journalists/bloggers because, if they can&#8217;t, or don&#8217;t want to, write about the story but still think it&#8217;s interesting or may write about it later, digging or bookmarking the release will allow them to keep track of it, see how many people find it interesting, or at least do a small part to make the story penetrate the overflow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Barbour</title>
		<link>http://twopointouch.com/2006/12/08/social-media-releases/#comment-5186</link>
		<dc:creator>James Barbour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 16:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twopointouch.com/2006/12/08/social-media-releases/#comment-5186</guid>
		<description>A very comprehensive analysis, and I have to say I share a lot of the concerns - particularly over the (ab?)use of digg / del.icio.us buttons.

And aren't releases supposed to make journalists' lives easier, not harder? (to your steak pie point).

Looks like Edelman have, to be fair, done a not bad job of creating a product they think clients will want.  But I'm not sure they're right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A very comprehensive analysis, and I have to say I share a lot of the concerns - particularly over the (ab?)use of digg / del.icio.us buttons.</p>
<p>And aren&#8217;t releases supposed to make journalists&#8217; lives easier, not harder? (to your steak pie point).</p>
<p>Looks like Edelman have, to be fair, done a not bad job of creating a product they think clients will want.  But I&#8217;m not sure they&#8217;re right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
