Comments on: The Next Next Big Thing http://twopointouch.com/2006/web-2-0/the-next-next-big-thing/ web 2.0, blogs and social media Mon, 15 Mar 2010 00:32:57 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: William Hill http://twopointouch.com/2006/web-2-0/the-next-next-big-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-12130 William Hill Mon, 07 Jan 2008 05:41:29 +0000 http://twopointouch.com/2006/12/05/the-next-next-big-thing/#comment-12130 Sorry for the duplicate post above. I think the WordPress platform was experiencing some issues during my initial submission which got hung during my attempt to post. My appologies for hitting the Submit button multiple times trying to correct the error and get my post submitted. I noticed it took it twice somehow and then WordPress sent me to a duplicate message detection page or something like that. Anyways back to the topic of Web 2.0! What does Web 2.0 mean to you? Sorry for the duplicate post above. I think the WordPress platform was experiencing some issues during my initial submission which got hung during my attempt to post. My appologies for hitting the Submit button multiple times trying to correct the error and get my post submitted. I noticed it took it twice somehow and then WordPress sent me to a duplicate message detection page or something like that.

Anyways back to the topic of Web 2.0! What does Web 2.0 mean to you?

]]> By: William Hill http://twopointouch.com/2006/web-2-0/the-next-next-big-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-12129 William Hill Mon, 07 Jan 2008 05:36:14 +0000 http://twopointouch.com/2006/12/05/the-next-next-big-thing/#comment-12129 Like it or not Web 2.0 is here to stay! It is becoming more transparent each passing day that Web 2.0 will forever impact the way Internet marketers of all sizes conduct their business. Social Networking sites are popping up left and right - steadily becoming crucial assets to any Internet marketering arsenal. As companies like, Google, News Corp, Yahoo and MSN pay BIG dollars to acquire Web 2.0 brands they are doing so for a few reasons. First they are looking for creative ways to push new, in-house products and services to targeted consumers and businesses alike. I would have to argue that Google is leading the pack in this arena. Next, they are trying to position their companies for rapid long-term growth, each headed in strategically aligned directions. In my opinion, all 3 are great companies and not any one of them is better than the other in regards to their directions. Rest assured that the overall concept, audience, and appeal of any recently acquired or soon to be acquired Web 2.0 brand is a solid reflection of the direction the acquiring company is headed in. Like it or not Web 2.0 is here to stay! (source - http://rxpop.com/) Like it or not Web 2.0 is here to stay! It is becoming more transparent each passing day that Web 2.0 will forever impact the way Internet marketers of all sizes conduct their business. Social Networking sites are popping up left and right – steadily becoming crucial assets to any Internet marketering arsenal. As companies like, Google, News Corp, Yahoo and MSN pay BIG dollars to acquire Web 2.0 brands they are doing so for a few reasons. First they are looking for creative ways to push new, in-house products and services to targeted consumers and businesses alike. I would have to argue that Google is leading the pack in this arena. Next, they are trying to position their companies for rapid long-term growth, each headed in strategically aligned directions. In my opinion, all 3 are great companies and not any one of them is better than the other in regards to their directions. Rest assured that the overall concept, audience, and appeal of any recently acquired or soon to be acquired Web 2.0 brand is a solid reflection of the direction the acquiring company is headed in. Like it or not Web 2.0 is here to stay! (source – http://rxpop.com/)

]]> By: William Hill http://twopointouch.com/2006/web-2-0/the-next-next-big-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-12128 William Hill Mon, 07 Jan 2008 05:34:19 +0000 http://twopointouch.com/2006/12/05/the-next-next-big-thing/#comment-12128 It is becoming more transparent each passing day that Web 2.0 will forever impact the way Internet marketers of all sizes conduct their business. Social Networking sites are popping up left and right - steadily becoming crucial assets to any Internet marketering arsenal. As companies like, Google, News Corp, Yahoo and MSN pay BIG dollars to acquire Web 2.0 brands they are doing so for a few reasons. First they are looking for creative ways to push new, in-house products and services to targeted consumers and businesses alike. I would have to argue that Google is leading the pack in this arena. Next, they are trying to position their companies for rapid long-term growth, each headed in strategically aligned directions. In my opinion, all 3 are great companies and not any one of them is better than the other in regards to their directions. Rest assured that the overall concept, audience, and appeal of any recently acquired or soon to be acquired Web 2.0 brand is a solid reflection of the direction the acquiring company is headed in. Like it or not Web 2.0 is here to stay! Source - www.rxpop.com It is becoming more transparent each passing day that Web 2.0 will forever impact the way Internet marketers of all sizes conduct their business. Social Networking sites are popping up left and right – steadily becoming crucial assets to any Internet marketering arsenal.

As companies like, Google, News Corp, Yahoo and MSN pay BIG dollars to acquire Web 2.0 brands they are doing so for a few reasons. First they are looking for creative ways to push new, in-house products and services to targeted consumers and businesses alike. I would have to argue that Google is leading the pack in this arena.

Next, they are trying to position their companies for rapid long-term growth, each headed in strategically aligned directions. In my opinion, all 3 are great companies and not any one of them is better than the other in regards to their directions. Rest assured that the overall concept, audience, and appeal of any recently acquired or soon to be acquired Web 2.0 brand is a solid reflection of the direction the acquiring company is headed in.

Like it or not Web 2.0 is here to stay!

Source – http://www.rxpop.com

]]> By: emmi http://twopointouch.com/2006/web-2-0/the-next-next-big-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-10851 emmi Mon, 23 Apr 2007 08:01:33 +0000 http://twopointouch.com/2006/12/05/the-next-next-big-thing/#comment-10851 Have you heard about a new story, using web 2.0 concept? It introduces modern China to chinese and non-chinese through a series of detective stories. This story is called Krem Trekker.. Check out the latest Krem Trekker story from www.kremtrekker.com Have you heard about a new story, using web 2.0 concept? It introduces modern China to chinese and non-chinese through a series of detective stories. This story is called Krem Trekker.. Check out the latest Krem Trekker story from http://www.kremtrekker.com

]]> By: Ian Delaney http://twopointouch.com/2006/web-2-0/the-next-next-big-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-5118 Ian Delaney Thu, 07 Dec 2006 21:44:35 +0000 http://twopointouch.com/2006/12/05/the-next-next-big-thing/#comment-5118 I always love a good pun, Roddy, so I looked it up for you. The Irish Web 2.0 conference that was the original bone of contention went ahead. Don't believe they were ever prosecuted. Not sure anyone has tried it on in the States, where the (TM) would have a bit more legal weight. O'Reilly himself wouldn't press for such a case, I'm sure of it, since he apologised for the misunderstanding publically on his blog. I always love a good pun, Roddy, so I looked it up for you.

The Irish Web 2.0 conference that was the original bone of contention went ahead. Don’t believe they were ever prosecuted.

Not sure anyone has tried it on in the States, where the (TM) would have a bit more legal weight. O’Reilly himself wouldn’t press for such a case, I’m sure of it, since he apologised for the misunderstanding publically on his blog.

]]> By: Roddy http://twopointouch.com/2006/web-2-0/the-next-next-big-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-5117 Roddy Thu, 07 Dec 2006 21:37:30 +0000 http://twopointouch.com/2006/12/05/the-next-next-big-thing/#comment-5117 With respect to the "Web 2.0" trademark case, Who 1.0? With respect to the “Web 2.0″ trademark case, Who 1.0?

]]> By: Marc - Stuck @ the Marriott http://twopointouch.com/2006/web-2-0/the-next-next-big-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-5038 Marc - Stuck @ the Marriott Tue, 05 Dec 2006 23:57:32 +0000 http://twopointouch.com/2006/12/05/the-next-next-big-thing/#comment-5038 Oh. Interesting. I didn't know that. Thanks for clarifying. Marc Oh. Interesting. I didn’t know that.

Thanks for clarifying.

Marc

]]> By: Ian Delaney http://twopointouch.com/2006/web-2-0/the-next-next-big-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-5036 Ian Delaney Tue, 05 Dec 2006 23:32:40 +0000 http://twopointouch.com/2006/12/05/the-next-next-big-thing/#comment-5036 Marc - if you look into the discussions, he didn't try to trademark web 2.0; the lawyers from the events management company did. It's a great case study of f**king up on the blogosphere, nonetheless. Marc – if you look into the discussions, he didn’t try to trademark web 2.0; the lawyers from the events management company did. It’s a great case study of f**king up on the blogosphere, nonetheless.

]]> By: Marc http://twopointouch.com/2006/web-2-0/the-next-next-big-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-5034 Marc Tue, 05 Dec 2006 23:16:40 +0000 http://twopointouch.com/2006/12/05/the-next-next-big-thing/#comment-5034 Should I sue him for using Who 2.0 without permission? I had applied for a trademark on it about 4 months ago. http://evolvingtrends.wordpress.com/2006/06/21/who-20-real-world/ Obviously, only joking re: trademark. But I don't think he's cool. What he did in threatening to sue companies for using the term Web 2.0 wasn't cool. Marc Should I sue him for using Who 2.0 without permission? I had applied for a trademark on it about 4 months ago.

http://evolvingtrends.wordpress.com/2006/06/21/who-20-real-world/

Obviously, only joking re: trademark.

But I don’t think he’s cool. What he did in threatening to sue companies for using the term Web 2.0 wasn’t cool.

Marc

]]> By: Jerry Leeson 2.0 » Whatever happened to 1.0? http://twopointouch.com/2006/web-2-0/the-next-next-big-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-5033 Jerry Leeson 2.0 » Whatever happened to 1.0? Tue, 05 Dec 2006 23:06:03 +0000 http://twopointouch.com/2006/12/05/the-next-next-big-thing/#comment-5033 [...] From twopointtouch, the next big thing ‘according to Tim O’Reilly’ is Who 2.0. Now, while there is some really interesting discussion here on Identity, what’s the deal with all things 2.0? In a previous article I suggested that Web 2.0 among other things, is a great marketing term but I probably should have refined that to just 2.0. There are so many * 2.0’s out there now but some seem to just jump straight there. I am joining the bandwagon for a while and appending 2.0 to the title of this blog. [...] [...] From twopointtouch, the next big thing ‘according to Tim O’Reilly’ is Who 2.0. Now, while there is some really interesting discussion here on Identity, what’s the deal with all things 2.0? In a previous article I suggested that Web 2.0 among other things, is a great marketing term but I probably should have refined that to just 2.0. There are so many * 2.0’s out there now but some seem to just jump straight there. I am joining the bandwagon for a while and appending 2.0 to the title of this blog. [...]

]]>