Proof YouTube is Good for TV

It’s always been obvious that watching 5-​​minute segments of TV pro­grammes on YouTube is likely to increase people’s desire to watch the real thing. Pete Cashmore reports that yes­terday, some proof has emerged. US TV network CBS has announced that viewer figures have risen con­sid­er­ably since striking a deal to create their own channel on the video-​​sharing service. The release says that “Professional content seeds YouTube and allows an open dialogue between estab­lished media players and a new set of viewers.” This is remark­able common sense given the current trend for main­stream media com­panies to sue anything that moves on the Internet. After just one month, the release continues:

CBS’s “Late Show with David Letterman” has added 200,000 (+5%) new viewers while “The Late Late Show with Craig Ferguson” is up 100,000 viewers (+7%) since the YouTube postings started.

Letterman’s inter­view with Borat has been viewed more than 1.4mn times over three weeks. It’s not dif­fi­cult to imagine some of those people thinking, “Oh. Letterman is some­times funny. I should check it out.” On the other hand, it’s very hard to imagine anyone thinking, “Well, I don’t need to watch that show now because two-​​and-​​a-​​half minutes of it have been posted here.”

David Poltrack, CBS’s chief research officer told Ad Age last week:

“We’re in a position right now where no one wants to take [content off YouTube] … When you have some­thing the public really wants, the economic value in that is to come up with a way to satisfy the rights holders and serve the consumers.“

Albert Cheng of the ABC-​​Disney TV group added that the success of YouTube is about a dif­ferent sort of viewing exper­i­ence to that offered on main­stream TV:

The video-​​sharing site may have cap­it­al­ized on the needs of the short-​​attention-​​span young adult on a wide­spread basis, but it’s not the be-​​all, end-​​all of accessing TV-​​related content.

“You wouldn’t want to watch ‘Lost’ broken into 50 pieces,” Mr. Cheng said. “There’s just more dif­ferent use cases that are allowing users to control how they watch content.“

Cashmore spec­u­lates that the recent lawsuits lined up against YouTube by Universal Music, Comedy Central, Time Warner and others aren’t so much about intel­lec­tual property, but rather provide a bar­gaining chip to secure better dis­tri­bu­tion deals with the network. This sounds like a reas­on­able inter­pret­a­tion to me, though perhaps we shouldn’t under­es­timate the effects of fear and stu­pidity in some of these companies.

Share this post:

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

Possibly related:

4 comments to Proof YouTube is Good for TV

Leave a Reply

  

  

  

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>