<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Understanding digg again, natural order</title>
	<atom:link href="http://twopointouch.com/2006/08/26/understanding-digg-again-natural-order/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://twopointouch.com/2006/social-media/understanding-digg-again-natural-order/</link>
	<description>web 2.0, blogs and social media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 00:32:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Digg to Repair Holes at twopointouch: web 2.0, blogs and social media</title>
		<link>http://twopointouch.com/2006/social-media/understanding-digg-again-natural-order/comment-page-1/#comment-396</link>
		<dc:creator>Digg to Repair Holes at twopointouch: web 2.0, blogs and social media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 12:04:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twopointouch.com/2006/08/26/understanding-digg-again-natural-order/#comment-396</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;ve written before about digg friendship groups, as have a large number of other people. After a certain point, it seems they did more harm than good. After becoming enormously popular very quickly, growth of the site had petered out. These changes seem designed to bring more people into digg and restore the perception that stories are promoted on their merits, rather than because of who submitted them. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;ve written before about digg friendship groups, as have a large number of other people. After a certain point, it seems they did more harm than good. After becoming enormously popular very quickly, growth of the site had petered out. These changes seem designed to bring more people into digg and restore the perception that stories are promoted on their merits, rather than because of who submitted them. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc - Stuck @ the Marriott</title>
		<link>http://twopointouch.com/2006/social-media/understanding-digg-again-natural-order/comment-page-1/#comment-377</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc - Stuck @ the Marriott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Sep 2006 16:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twopointouch.com/2006/08/26/understanding-digg-again-natural-order/#comment-377</guid>
		<description>Ian,

Have a look at this:

http://evolvingtrends.wordpress.com/2006/09/03/wisdom-addition-machine/

Cheers,

Marc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ian,</p>
<p>Have a look at this:</p>
<p><a href="http://evolvingtrends.wordpress.com/2006/09/03/wisdom-addition-machine/" rel="nofollow">http://evolvingtrends.wordpress.com/2006/09/03/wisdom-addition-machine/</a></p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Marc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
